|
Appendix B of the KCDB covered 679 key and supplementary comparisons conducted under the auspices of the CIPM and the Regional Metrology Organizations (RMOs) on 29 May 2006. These include 542 key comparisons. On average, one new key comparison has been registered each week over the last year. About 45 % of the registered key comparisons have results already published in the Appendix B of the KCDB.

Distribution of the number of key comparisons registered in the Appendix B of the KCDB according to the conducting bodies (CC stands for Consultative Committees) on 29 May 2006.
A number of key comparison results are regularly updated. These mainly concern the ongoing BIPM key comparisons in electricity (Josephson standards at 10 V) and on radionuclide activity conducted within the framework of the International System of Reference (SIR). These updates correspond to new bilateral comparisons that are regularly carried out between the BIPM and various NMIs. In addition, new data concerning the computation of Coordinated Universal Time, UTC (key comparison CCTF-K2001.UTC), are published every month. We have also registered a new BIPM key comparison, BIPM.QM-K1 (ozone at ambient level), as a follow-up of Pilot Study CCQM-P28.
The results of 38 RMO key comparisons (16 conducted by APMP and 22 by EUROMET) are linked to those of the corresponding CC key comparisons; the full sets of degrees of equivalence are generally published in the KCDB. Linkage has also been carried out for 17 CC key comparisons, among which 11 are key comparisons of radionuclide activity conducted under the auspices of Section II of the CCRI, and linked to the corresponding ongoing BIPM SIR key comparisons. The six others are bilateral key comparisons subsequent to full-scale CC key comparisons; their results are added on the appropriate graphs of equivalence.
The measurand defined for one given key comparison may often take several nominal values and the parameters involved (temperature, frequency, etc.) may also be varied, with the consequence that one key comparison result generally comprises several matrices and graphs of equivalence; for example, a set of 43 matrices and 43 graphs for key comparison CCT-K1 published on 21 March 2006. It follows that the KCDB Appendix B currently displays about 680 graphs showing equivalence between standards or capabilities of institutes participating in the CIPM MRA.
The entry of results in the KCDB Appendix B is an intensive and continuous effort. When a new approved report is received at the KCDB Office, it is placed in the queue for publication. On average, six new reports are in the queue at any one time, leading to delays of publication that may reach several weeks. This is a new phenomenon, arising from the growing amount of data, especially updates of ongoing comparisons.
Latest KC results published
|